中文
English

Only after refunding, Pinduoduo felt Tiktok to cross the river

2025-05-02

Only after refunding, Pinduoduo felt Tiktok to cross the river

New eyes

New eyes

Certified Author Lv.3

follow with interest

This article is from WeChat official account: New Eyes, written by Lu Yao, and the title is from AI Generation


Article Summary

After canceling the "refund only" policy, Pinduoduo has shifted from "extreme low prices" to content-based and industrial belt layout, attempting to reshape its competitiveness through short videos, live broadcasts, and factory direct connections. However, it faces challenges such as the solidification of users' low-priced mentality, conflicts among merchants, and slower performance growth. The transformation effect has not met expectations and it is difficult to get rid of path dependence.


•    Rule adjustment: The cancellation of the refund policy only triggers conflicts between the platform and merchants, forcing Pinduoduo to balance ecological governance and growth pressure.


•    Content based transformation: short video and live broadcast, imitating Tiktok, but with low conversion rate, traffic still relies on traditional commodity display logic.


•    Competition for industrial belts: Intensifying the layout of industrial belt resources, attempting to strengthen the low price advantage through C2M mode, but facing conflicts in brand pricing system.


•   ⚖️ Tiktok comparison: there is an essential difference between the content based path and Tiktok, which cannot be closed loop "grass planting conversion", and traffic distribution depends on platform rules.


•    Path dependence: The marketing system is scattered and extensive, and short-term order taking tools still rely on price compensation, making it difficult to break through the bottleneck of refined operations.


•    Performance pressure: revenue growth slows down, market value shrinks to half of Alibaba's, and the contradiction between industrial belt investment and short-term financial returns becomes prominent.

The dust of 'refund only' has settled, and the first to be pushed to the forefront are not consumers or merchants, but the wool party.




This adjustment is interpreted as a shift from "extreme consumer protection" to "balanced governance", targeting passive refunds under excessive platform intervention. However, it should be noted that this does not deprive consumers of their right to reasonable rights protection - for example, after receiving rotten fruits, people's reasonable demands for partial refunds through negotiation with merchants will still be protected.




This widely discussed rule can be traced back to 2014 when JD.com launched a self operated product only refund policy. The original intention was to improve local operational efficiency by reducing the time and shipping costs of returns and exchanges. However, no one expected that seven years later Pinduoduo would rewrite it as a heavy weapon of industry competition.




At that time, Pinduoduo had nearly 9 million merchants, mainly small and medium-sized merchants and white label brands, with low-priced products clustered and highly homogeneous SKUs. In addition, the natural short shelf life and high breakage rate of fresh food categories, coupled with the regulatory pressure brought by the massive transactions of 900 million active buyers, prompted the platform to adopt an "extreme consumer oriented" operational strategy to maintain growth.




We all know the story behind it. When Pinduoduo gradually expanded its refund only policy from the fresh food category to the entire category, the platform did indeed enter high-speed growth and also opened the prelude to industry competition. In the past few years, extreme price comparison and low price have become strategic keywords for almost all platforms, the most direct reason being to resist Pinduoduo's impact on market share.




However, with the gradual return of rationality in the industry in the past year, especially the complete cancellation of "refund only", industry competition has been re tuned - returning from "internal service competition" to "commercial essence", and Chinese e-commerce platforms have once again returned to the same starting line.




For the industry, this is indeed good news to rectify the situation, and it is time for all parties to engage in a comprehensive strength competition. But for Pinduoduo, the situation may be even more severe, and it must answer a more fundamental question: after stripping away the dual filters of extreme low price and extreme after-sales, what does this platform, which subverts the industry with "price comparison", rely on to maintain growth?




Price war cannot sustain Pinduoduo's core competitiveness




Every major decision adjustment of a large e-commerce platform is inevitably the result of systematic argumentation and multidimensional weighing.




Cancelling 'refund only' is no exception. On the surface, it appears to fix systemic vulnerabilities in the old model, but in reality, it is a concentrated outbreak of conflicts between the platform and merchants. The platform has to consider sustainable development and future strategic transformation.




According to merchant data, extreme rules have led to fluctuations in return rates, increased operating costs for small and medium-sized merchants, and a deeper crisis is that the ecosystem that overly relies on low price strategies is backfiring on the platform - Pinduoduo has long been the industry leader in product complaints and has significant merchant liquidity.




This explains why in Pinduoduo's recent intensive actions, the two main themes of "content-based" and "industrial belt narrative" have become increasingly clear and visible. The former is the common layout of the traditional shelf e-commerce platform in response to content e-commerce, while the latter is more based on a re combing under the original C2M gene. Interestingly, these all form a subtle echo with the development path of Tiktok e-commerce.




In fact, looking back at the actions of Pinduoduo in the past two years, these adjustments have already laid the groundwork.




In 2022, "Duoduo Video" replaced "Live Streaming" and entered the bottom tier entrance of the homepage. With the subsidy of real money, the peak DAU exceeded 150 million, and the daily average usage time of users exceeded 40 minutes; Starting from 2023, the platform will increase its live streaming business and attract external anchors through initiatives such as the "New Superstar Plan" and the "Hundred Production Plan" to promote the implementation of in store broadcasting models.




Content transformation was once seen as a new engine for Pinduoduo to achieve growth.




Last year, Duoduo's short drama became popular, and users were automatically recommended to match sales videos with relevant search records every few episodes they swiped. However, according to QuestMobile's statistics, compared to the conversion rate of 2% to 5% on mainstream e-commerce platforms' detail pages, the industry generally believes that the conversion rate of short video e-commerce is about 1% to 3%, and Pinduoduo's short video sales performance has also fallen short of expectations.




Since the launch of the "Billion Dollar Reduction" and "New Quality Merchant Support Program" in 2024, Pinduoduo has continued to tilt its resources towards the upstream of the supply chain. Content has become an important carrier of this strategy: influencers showcase the production processes of industrial belt factories and the traceability stories of agricultural products, packaging low-priced goods as "cost-effective choices" rather than simply "cheap goods".




However, compared with Tiktok, which takes "content is traffic" as its core, it realizes "goods looking for people" through algorithm recommendation; Pinduoduo's content is more like a digital upgrade of shelf e-commerce, with short videos and live broadcasts still mainly displaying product information, essentially a dynamic extension of traditional detail pages.




In other words, there is an essential difference between the content of Pinduoduo and Tiktok. As a result, it ultimately makes it difficult for the former to replicate the closed loop of "seeding conversion" of the latter, and traffic conversion relies more on platform rules - for example, merchants need to mount short videos to product detail pages through "targeted promotion" in order to achieve precise guidance.




Since this year, Pinduoduo has begun to recruit Tiktok live broadcast merchants and provide them with intelligent central control system support, which is regarded as a signal for the live broadcast business to seek external blood transfusion. However, the dual platform live streaming model also brings potential problems: how to coordinate cross platform pricing systems and avoid content homogenization, which have become practical challenges facing platforms.




From 'subsidy driven' to 'return to industrial belt': the pains of transformation are emerging




The self e-commerce industry has entered stock competition, and industrial belt merchants are being fiercely contested by major platforms.




From Yiwu small commodities in Zhejiang and the clothing industry belt in Guangdong, to flowers and plants in Yunnan and fur, grain, and oil in Northeast China, it is essentially the cluster production capacity, supply chain efficiency, and cost advantages behind them, which precisely meet the needs of e-commerce platforms in terms of traffic competition, user retention, and supply chain upgrading, directly supporting the low price strategy of e-commerce platforms.




Pinduoduo's layout around industrial belt merchants has become increasingly dense in the past two years. In 2023, we will upgrade the "Pinbing Brand" support plan. Last year, we launched the "Billion Reduction" program to save billions of dollars in promotion costs for millions of merchants. The "E-commerce Westward Expansion" plan aims to increase the number of orders in the western region. This year, we will establish a Merchant Rights Protection Committee and launch a billion dollar support plan.




A series of measures all aim at the same goal - to reconstruct the supply ecology centered on industrial belts.




In fact, the resources of industrial belt merchants should have been one of Pinduoduo's core competitiveness. The "white label goods" attribute perfectly matches Pinduoduo's user needs. In the early days, the platform directly connected to agricultural product production areas through the "agricultural land cloud consolidation" model. In 2020, it became the largest agricultural product upstream platform in China, verifying the supporting role of industrial belt resources in the low price mentality.




Pinduoduo's C2M has always been its differentiation model from traditional e-commerce. By analyzing user needs through big data and providing reverse guidance to industrial belt merchants in production, we can achieve "production based on demand", where there is production, there is sales, and then optimize the supply chain, ultimately forming a cycle of "low price sales cost optimization". This has almost become a steady win game under the logic of "buying together".




It is not difficult to find that the main role of industrial belt resources in Pinduoduo is still to support the continuous operation of the platform's "low price" model.




On the other hand, the spark of conflict between platforms and industrial belt merchants has emerged.




Taking the liquor industry as an example, according to media reports, major brand merchants generally regard Pinduoduo as an online Bairong market (the largest Baijiu distribution center in China), and almost all local liquor merchants also regard Pinduoduo as the main channel for low price inventory consumption. But for brands, what they fear is not low prices, but price breakdowns and chaos.




Traditional brands rely on a hierarchical channel system of "manufacturer → distributor → secondary distributor → terminal", with reasonable profit margins at each stage. But Pinduoduo's low-priced direct connection to consumers is equivalent to allowing distributors to bypass the second batch of merchants and directly reach the terminals, breaking the original price stratification. The same bottle of wine may be sold at a lower price online on Pinduoduo than through offline channels, which in the long run can lead to the manufacturer losing control over the channels.




For brands, the disruption of market prices is no different from the overdraft of brand image - from alcoholic beverages to various electronic products, the same problem can occur in almost every category.




In addition, for a long time, the value of industrial belt merchants on Pinduoduo has not been fully tapped.




After the rise of live broadcast e-commerce and short video delivery, the story of "direct supply from the source" of the industrial belt has become a natural flow material. This "production scene visualization" has reduced the cost of user decision-making, especially in line with the content e-commerce logic of Tiktok, Kwai and other platforms. By supporting industrial belt merchants, the platform can not only drive the transformation of contract factories into branded industries, but also enrich the content ecosystem and improve traffic monetization efficiency.




Therefore, many observant people have found that Pinduoduo, which has suffered setbacks in the fields of short video and live streaming sales, has now shifted its focus to storytelling for industrial belt merchants. But in the eyes of industry insiders, transformation is not an easy task.




On the one hand, users have a deep-rooted "low price mentality" towards Pinduoduo, and the quality attempts accompanying supply chain upgrades may face the risk of losing price sensitive users; On the other hand, the branding of industrial belt merchants requires long-term investment, testing the platform's resource allocation capabilities from technical support to market promotion.




The greater pressure comes from the performance aspect. According to the Q4 2024 financial report, Pinduoduo's total revenue was 110.6 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 24.45%, significantly slowing down compared to the same period in 2023; The net profit growth rate decreased from 60.73% to 17.9%, falling short of market expectations for two consecutive quarters. The growth rate in the first quarter of 2025 will further decline to below 15%.




Although the management attributed the reason to "external environment and merchant support investment" and emphasized that "short-term financial performance should not be the only evaluation criterion", the market did not buy it: two days after the release of the financial report, the stock price had fallen by more than 10% cumulatively, and the current market value of about 140 billion US dollars is only half of Alibaba's, and the advantage of market capitalization has significantly narrowed.




Difficult to get rid of path dependence




In the Chinese e-commerce industry, Pinduoduo has always been a special presence.




The company has a large scale, but the management rarely appears in public. Although it often does not follow the routine, it is like a machine that operates automatically at all times, "the most extreme and efficient", focusing on e-commerce, not diversified, with extreme price differences and the closest business model to Costco - this is the evaluation of Pinduoduo by the outside world during its heyday.




But as we all know, China has the most complex business scenarios and diverse trading rules, and the most essential thing is change. As the market tends to become more competitive, platforms are placing their growth expectations on "stock" and making good use of the so-called "refined operation" - but this term is not commonly seen in Pinduoduo.




From the perspective of industry conventions, a unified marketing hub is often an important indicator to measure the maturity of an e-commerce platform, such as Taotian's Alibaba mom and Tiktok's huge engine. They are not only the core source of profit, but also play an important role in integrating ecological resources and promoting cross platform collaboration, while providing systematic and quantifiable fine operation solutions for businesses.




Pinduoduo's marketing model is very different from theirs. As a group buying platform based on social e-commerce and low price strategy, Pinduoduo relied on "social fission" to open up the market in the early stage, forming a path of "platform led traffic distribution". The merchant advertising system focuses on social fission, low-priced promotions, and user growth. For example, "Duoduo Jinbao" has a commission sharing mechanism similar to Taobao customers, while "Billion Subsidy" attracts consumers through direct profit sharing.




It is worth noting that in Pinduoduo's main marketing methods, functions such as "bundling" and "bargaining" are essentially carriers of social communication and user fission, rather than traditional advertising systems. Although the merchant's backend integrates multiple products such as "Duoduo Search", "Duoduo Scene", and "Focus on Booth", their marketing system is still fragmented.




The limitation of this model is that it overly relies on price advantages and has obvious shortcomings in systematic and diversified business strategies.




Previously, Huang Zheng said that they preferred to build an infrastructure by refining and layering the national population, and opening data to businesses. Each category of population corresponds to a large number of factories, so as to meet their specific consumption needs. In this way, they can not only bring a steady stream of demand, but also meet the continuous supply.




But at present, this does not mean that the platform can completely avoid refined and differentiated operational logic.




Recently, Pinduoduo launched a video call function. Although the actual effect is still unknown, it is still seen as a signal of its attempt to refine operations. To some extent, this function can even be understood as a follow-up to the cancellation of "refund only". In the past, merchants relied on crude methods such as "full discount coupons" and "low-priced flash sales" to acquire customers. Nowadays, platforms are attempting to improve service quality through "one-on-one" video communication in order to achieve an increase in repurchase rate and average customer value.




Behind the transformation is the driving force of industry trends: when the cost of attracting new customers on platforms such as Taobao and JD.com has reached over a thousand yuan, extensive subsidies are difficult to sustain, and platforms and merchants have to turn to optimizing service processes and improving conversion rates to reduce marginal costs.




But for Pinduoduo, which started with social fission, the challenge may be even more daunting. Recently, it has been reported that after canceling the refund only policy, the platform has tested a redemption tool to reduce the return and refund rate. When consumers apply for a refund, the tool automatically sends the merchant's pre-set retention plan, such as providing compensation, in exchange for the cancellation fee holder revoking the application.




Essentially, this approach still solves problems through price measures and does not break out of the original logical framework. In other words, for this company, how to break away from the previous path dependence and balance short-term effects with long-term ecological construction on the road of refined operation will be the long-term challenges faced by Pinduoduo.




This article is from the WeChat official account: New Eyes, written by Lu Yao


New eyes

New eyes


Hard core business analysis, official account of the same name: new eyes



Certified Author


139 articles have been published in Tiger Sniff


This content is the author's independent viewpoint and does not represent the stance of Tiger Sniff. Reproduction without permission is not allowed. Please contact for authorization matters hezuo@huxiu.com

If you have any objections or complaints about this article, please contact tougao@huxiu.com

People who are changing and want to change the world are all on the Tiger Sniff app




仅退款后,拼多多摸着抖音过河

本文来自微信公众号:新眸,作者:鹿尧,题图来自:AI生成


文章摘要
拼多多取消“仅退款”政策后,从“极致低价”转向内容化和产业带布局,试图通过短视频、直播和工厂直连重塑竞争力,但面临用户低价心智固化、商家矛盾及业绩增速放缓等挑战,转型效果未达预期且难摆脱路径依赖。

• 规则调整:仅退款政策取消引发平台与商家矛盾,倒逼拼多多平衡生态治理与增长压力。

• 内容化转型:发力短视频和直播,模仿抖音但转化率低,流量仍依赖传统商品展示逻辑。

• 产业带争夺:加码产业带资源布局,试图通过C2M模式强化低价优势,但面临品牌价格体系冲突。

• ⚖️抖音对比:内容化路径与抖音存在本质差异,无法闭环“种草-转化”,流量分发依赖平台规则。

• 路径依赖:营销体系分散粗放,短期挽单工具仍靠价格补偿,难突破精细化运营瓶颈。

• 业绩压力:营收增速放缓,市值缩水至阿里一半,产业带投入与短期财务回报矛盾凸显。

“仅退款”尘埃落定,最先被推上风口浪尖的不是消费者或商家,而是羊毛党。


这次调整被解读为从“极致消费者保护”向“平衡治理”的转向,针对的是平台过度介入下的被动退款,但需要注意的是,这并非剥夺消费者合理维权的权利——比如人们收到烂水果后,通过与商家协商获得部分退款的合理诉求,依然会得到保障。


这项引发广泛讨论的规则,最早可追溯至2014年京东推出的自营商品仅退款,初衷是通过降低退换货的时间与运费成本,提升局部运营效率。只不过,谁也没想到的是,七年后拼多多会将其改写成行业竞争的重武器。


彼时,拼多多拥有近900万商家,以中小商家和白牌为主,低价商品聚集、SKU高度同质化,加上生鲜品类天然存在的保质期短和高破损率,9亿活跃买家的海量交易带来的监管压力,促使平台采取“极致偏向消费者”的运营策略以维持增长。


后面的故事我们都知道了。当拼多多将仅退款从生鲜品类逐步扩展至全品类时,平台的确同步驶入了高速增长,同时也拉开了行业内卷的序幕。过去几年,极致的比价和低价几乎成了所有平台的战略关键词,最直接的原因就是抵抗拼多多对市场份额的冲击。


然而,随着近一年行业逐渐回归理性,尤其是“仅退款”的全面取消,行业竞争被重新定调——从“内卷式服务竞争”回归“商业本质”,中国电商平台再次回到了同一起跑线。


对于行业来说,这的确是拨乱反正的好消息,各家是时候展开综合实力的较量了。但对于拼多多,情况或许更严峻,它必须回答一个更本质的问题:剥离极致低价和极致售后的双重滤镜后,这家以“比价”颠覆行业的平台,究竟靠什么来维持增长?


价格战撑不起拼多多的核心竞争力


大型电商平台的每一次重大决策调整,必然是经过系统化论证与多维度权衡后的结果。


取消“仅退款”也不例外,表面看是要修复旧模式的系统性漏洞,实际上是平台与商家矛盾的集中爆发,平台不得不为持续发展和未来的战略转型做考量。


商家端数据显示,极端规则导致退货率波动起伏,中小商家运营成本增加,更深层的危机是,过度依赖低价策略的生态正在反噬平台——拼多多商品投诉量久居行业第一,商家流动性明显。


这解释了为何拼多多近期的密集动作中,“内容化”和“产业带叙事”两条主线越发清晰可见。前者是传统货架电商平台应对内容电商下的共同布局,后者则更多是基于原先C2M基因下的一次重新梳理,有意思的是——这些都与抖音电商的发展路径形成微妙呼应。


事实上,回看近两年拼多多的动作,这些调整其实早有铺垫。


2022年,“多多视频”取代“直播”跻身首页底部一级入口,在真金白银的补贴下,DAU峰值突破1.5亿,用户日均使用时长超40分钟;2023年起,平台加码直播业务,通过“新超星计划”“百产计划”等吸引外部主播,推动店播模式落地。


内容化改造一度被视作拼多多实现增长的新引擎。


去年,多多短剧出圈,用户每滑动几集短剧,就会被自动推荐匹配有相关搜索记录的带货视频。但据QuestMobile统计,相比主流电商平台详情页2%~5%的转化率,行业普遍认为,短视频电商转化率约为1%~3%,拼多多的短视频带货效果也未及预期。


自2024年推出“百亿减免”“新质商家扶持计划”后,拼多多将资源持续向供应链上游倾斜。内容化成为这一战略的重要载体:达人通过展示产业带工厂生产流程、农产品溯源故事,将低价商品包装为“性价比之选”,而非单纯的“廉价货”。


不过相比抖音以“内容即流量”为核心,通过算法推荐实现“货找人”的全域种草;拼多多的内容更像是“货架电商的数字化升级”,短视频和直播仍以商品信息展示为主,本质是传统详情页的动态化延伸。


换句话说,拼多多的内容化与抖音存在本质差异。以至于最终导致前者难以复制后者“种草-转化”的闭环,反而流量转化更依赖平台规则——例如,商家需通过“定向推广”将短视频挂载到商品详情页,才能实现精准导流。


今年以来,拼多多又开始招募抖音直播商家入驻,并为商家提供智能中控系统支持,这一举措被看作直播业务寻求外部输血的信号。但双平台直播模式也带来潜在问题:如何协调跨平台价格体系、避免内容同质化,这些成为摆在平台面前的现实挑战。


从“补贴驱动”到“回归产业带”:转型阵痛显现


自电商行业进入存量竞争,产业带商家就被各大平台竞相争夺。


从浙江的义乌小商品、广东的服装产业带,到云南的鲜花绿植、东北的皮草粮油,本质上是其背后的集群化生产能力、供应链效率和成本优势,精准契合了电商平台在流量竞争、用户留存、供应链升级等命题上的需求,直接支撑着电商平台的低价策略。


拼多多近两年围绕产业带商家的布局越发密集。2023年升级“拼品牌”扶持计划,去年推出“百亿减免”为千万商家节省数十亿推广成本,“电商西进”计划实现西部订单量增长,今年成立商家权益保护委员会并推出千亿扶持计划。


一系列举措,均指向同一个目标——重构以产业带为核心的供给生态。


事实上,产业带商家资源本就应该是拼多多的核心竞争力之一,“白牌商品”属性完美匹配拼多多的用户需求,平台早期通过“农地云拼”模式直连农产品产地,2020年即成为中国最大的农产品上行平台,验证了产业带资源对低价心智的支撑作用。


拼多多的C2M也一直是其区别于传统电商的差异化模式。通过大数据分析用户需求,反向指导产业带商家生产,实现“以需定产”,有产就有销,进而去做供应链的优化,最终形成“低价-销量-成本优化”的循环,这几乎成了“拼购”逻辑下的稳赢玩法。


到这里不难发现,产业带资源之于拼多多的主要作用,仍然是支撑起平台“低价”模式的持续运作。


但另一方面,平台与产业带商家之间矛盾的导火索就此产生。


以酒业为例,据媒体报道,品牌大商一般将拼多多视作一个线上的百荣市场(全国最大的白酒集散地),各地酒商也几乎都将拼多多作为低价消库存的主要渠道。但对于品牌来说,他们怕的不是低价,而是破价和乱价。


传统品牌依赖“厂家→经销商→二批商→终端”的层级渠道体系,每个环节都有合理利润空间。但拼多多的低价直连消费者,相当于让经销商绕过二批商直接触达终端,这打破了原有的价格分层。同样一瓶酒,在拼多多线上的销售价格可能要低于线下渠道商的进价,长此以往会导致厂家对渠道的控制力丧失。


对于品牌来说,市场价格的扰乱无异于品牌形象的透支——从酒类,到各种电子产品,同样的问题几乎能在各个类目上演。


除此以外,很长时间以来,拼多多上的产业带商家的价值并未被充分挖掘。


直播电商、短视频带货兴起后,产业带的“源头直供”故事成为天然的流量素材,这种“生产场景可视化”降低了用户决策成本,尤其契合抖音、快手等平台的内容电商逻辑。平台通过扶持产业带商家,既能拉动代工厂向品牌的产业转型,也能丰富内容生态,提升流量变现效率。


因此,不少细心的人发现,在短视频、直播带货领域受挫的拼多多,当下把重点也转向了面向产业带商家进行叙事。但在业内人士看来,转型并非易事。


一方面,用户对拼多多的“低价心智”根深蒂固,供应链升级伴随的品质化尝试,可能面临价格敏感型用户的流失风险;另一方面,产业带商家的品牌化需要长期投入,从技术支持到市场推广,均考验平台的资源调配能力。


更大的压力来自业绩层面。2024年四季度财报显示,拼多多总营收1106亿元,同比增长24.45%,较2023年同期显著放缓;净利润增速从60.73%降至17.9%,连续两季不及市场预期。2025年一季度增速进一步滑落至15%以下。


尽管管理层将原因归结为“外部环境与商家支持投入”,并强调“短期财务表现不应作为唯一评估标准”,但市场对此并不买账:财报发布后两日,股价累计跌幅超10%,当前1400亿美元左右的市值仅为阿里巴巴的一半,曾经的市值反超优势已大幅收窄。


难以摆脱的路径依赖


在中国电商行业里,拼多多一直是个特殊的存在。


公司体量庞大,但管理层鲜少公开露面,虽然经常不按套路出牌,但其就像一个机器一样,时刻自动运转,“最极致、效率最高”,专注电商,不多元化,拥有压到极致的差价和最接近Costco的商业模式——这是拼多多处在高光期时外界对其的评价。


但众所周知,国内拥有最复杂的商业场景和最繁复多样的交易规则,最不缺的就是变化,随着市场趋于内卷,平台纷纷将增长期望寄托于“存量”,用好所谓的“精细化运营”——但这个词汇在拼多多身上并不多见。


就拿行业常规来看,统一的营销中枢往往是衡量一个电商平台成熟的重要指标,如淘天的阿里妈妈、抖音的巨量引擎,他们不仅是核心盈利来源,更承担着整合生态资源、推动跨平台协同的重要角色,同时为商家提供系统化、可量化的精细运营方案。


拼多多的营销模式和他们很不一样。作为以社交电商和低价策略为根基的拼购平台,拼多多早期依靠“社交裂变”在下沉市场打开局面,形成了“平台主导流量分配”的路径。商家广告系统聚焦于社交裂变、低价促销和用户增长,例如“多多进宝”类似淘宝客的分佣机制,“百亿补贴”则通过直接让利吸引消费者。


值得注意的是,在拼多多的主要营销方式中,“拼单”“砍价”等功能本质上是社交传播和用户裂变的载体,而非传统意义上的广告系统。尽管商家后台集成了“多多搜索”“多多场景”“聚焦展位”等多个产品,但其营销体系仍然分散。


这种模式的局限性在于,过度依赖价格优势,而在系统性、多元化的经营策略上存在明显短板。


此前,黄峥曾表示,相比布局采销这类职能部门来推进销售,他们更倾向于打造一种基础设施,通过将全国人群进行细化和分层,并把数据开放给商家,每一类人群都对应着大量的工厂,从而满足其特定的消费需求,这样一来,既能够带来源源不断的需求,也能够满足持续不断的供给。


但就目前来看,这并不意味着平台能够完全回避精细化、差异化的运营逻辑。


近期拼多多上线了视频通话功能,虽然实际效果还无从得知,但仍被视为其尝试精细化运营的信号,某种程度上,这个功能甚至可以理解为应对“仅退款”取消的后手。过去商家依赖“满减券”“低价秒杀”等粗放方式获客,如今平台试图通过“一对一”视频沟通提升服务质量,以实现复购率和客单价的提升。


转变的背后,是行业趋势的推动:当淘宝、京东等平台拉新成本已达千元以上,粗放式补贴难以为继,平台和商家不得不转向优化服务流程、提升转化率来降低边际成本。


但对于依靠社交裂变起家的拼多多而言,挑战或许更为艰巨。近期有消息显示,在取消仅退款政策后,为降低退货退款率,平台测试了一款挽单工具,在消费者申请退款时自动发送商家预设的挽留方案,如提供补偿等,以换取消费者撤销申请。


本质上,这种做法仍是通过价格手段解决问题,并未跳出原有的逻辑框架。换句话说,对于这家公司而言,如何跳出以往的路径依赖,如何在精细化运营的道路上,平衡短期效果与长期生态建设,这些都将是拼多多面临的长远课题。


本文来自微信公众号:新眸,作者:鹿尧

本内容为作者独立观点,不代表虎嗅立场。未经允许不得转载,授权事宜请联系hezuo@huxiu.com
如对本稿件有异议或投诉,请联系tougao@huxiu.com
正在改变与想要改变世界的人,都在 虎嗅APP
Read1
share
Write a Review...
推荐文章
1  /  180